Non-elementary school age children should ride regular transit buses.
The majority of the day, most roads are empty. The same is true of buses. But for a small portion of the day, both roads and buses are crowded. For buses, that part of the day is murder. Most UTA buses are single-door access During peak times, more people get on and off the bus. Thus, each stop takes longer, and thus the entire ride takes longer.
Apart from solutions suggested elsewhere, the idea of simply doubling capacity appeals--add more buses. After all, over half the people on buses are on the bus during those hours. Why not have more buses during those hours? Simply put, a lack of buses and drivers.
And thus my argument for putting teenagers on regular buses: Because the 'peak' of use for school trips and work trips don't line up. Schools trips peak in the afternoon, work trips peak in the evening. By using regular transit buses for teenagers, a transit agency would be able to support a larger number of buses, and thereby to increase service for work trips during the peak hour, making bus travel faster and more reliable.
It would allow school districts to do away with the enormous limited use bus fleets every school district is obliged to support, while making better use of the public public transit resource.
If fearful parents demand some buses be 'school children only', I am prepared to accept that compromise to increase the size of the available bus fleet for non-school children use for the rest of the day.
9-line access access management access point accessibility ADA air quality alignment amenity antiplanner atlanta BART BID bike Blogs boston branded bus branded buses brookings brt bus Bus Rapid Transit BYU capacity car pool cars central link Centrality certification commuter rail condo congestion congestion pricing connections consistency coverage crossings CRT cycling DART dedicated dedicated right of way density denver depreciation developers development economics efficiency Envision Utah equity eugene exclusive extension FAQ favela Federal Funding Flex Bus florida free fare zone freeways Frequent Transit Network frontrunner frontunner Gallivan garden cities gas prices geotagging goat Google grade-separation Granary District growth headway heavy rail hedonic High Speed Rail history housing housing affordability housing bubble housing prices HOV income infill innovative intersections intensity ITS junk science LA land use LEED legacy city light rail linear park location LRT lyft M/ART malls mapping maps metrics metro MetroRail missoula mixed mixed traffic mixed-traffic mobile mode choice Mode Share multi-family MXD neighborhood networks news NIMBY office online op-ed open letter Operations parking parking meters peak travel pedestrian environment phasing Photomorphing planning Portland property property values Provo proximity quality_transit rail railvolution rant rapid rapid transit RDA real estate redevelopment reliability research retail Ridership ridesharing right of way roadway network ROW salt lake city san diego schedule schedule span seattle separated shuttle silver line single family SLC SLC transit master plan slums smartphone snow sprawl standing stop spacing streetcar streetscape streetscaping subdivision subsidy Sugarhouse Sugarhouse Streetcar Tacoma taxi technology tenure termini time-separation TOD townhouse traffic signal tram transit transit networks transit oriented development Transit Planning transponder transportation travel time TRAX trip planning trolley tunnel uber university of utah urban design urban economics urban land UTA UTA 2 Go Trip Planner utah Utah County Utah Transit Authority vmt walking distance web welfare transit Westside Connector WFRC wheelchairs zoning