9-line access access management access point accessibility ADA air quality alignment amenity antiplanner atlanta BART BID bike Blogs boston branded bus branded buses brookings brt bus Bus Rapid Transit BYU capacity car pool cars central link Centrality certification commuter rail condo congestion congestion pricing connections consistency coverage crossings CRT cycling DART dedicated dedicated right of way density denver depreciation developers development economics efficiency Envision Utah equity eugene exclusive extension FAQ favela Federal Funding Flex Bus florida free fare zone freeways Frequent Transit Network frontrunner frontunner Gallivan garden cities gas prices geotagging goat Google grade-separation Granary District growth headway heavy rail hedonic High Speed Rail history housing housing affordability housing bubble housing prices HOV income infill innovative intersections intensity ITS junk science LA land use LEED legacy city light rail linear park location LRT lyft M/ART malls mapping maps metrics metro MetroRail missoula mixed mixed traffic mixed-traffic mobile mode choice Mode Share multi-family MXD neighborhood networks news NIMBY office online op-ed open letter Operations parking parking meters peak travel pedestrian environment phasing Photomorphing planning Portland property property values Provo proximity quality_transit rail railvolution rant rapid rapid transit RDA real estate redevelopment reliability research retail Ridership ridesharing right of way roadway network ROW salt lake city san diego schedule schedule span seattle separated shuttle silver line single family SLC SLC transit master plan slums smartphone snow sprawl standing stop spacing streetcar streetscape streetscaping subdivision subsidy Sugarhouse Sugarhouse Streetcar Tacoma taxi technology tenure termini time-separation TOD townhouse traffic signal tram transit transit networks transit oriented development Transit Planning transponder transportation travel time TRAX trip planning trolley tunnel uber university of utah urban design urban economics urban land UTA UTA 2 Go Trip Planner utah Utah County Utah Transit Authority vmt walking distance web welfare transit Westside Connector WFRC wheelchairs zoning

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

The Bureaucrats answer vs. the Engineers answer.

This is simple enraging.
It is the bureaucrats answers: "It can't be done because it will require additional resources", rather than the engineers answer: "It can be done, but it will cost..." It would cost. No questions asked. And if the costs can't be paid by the users (through fares) they would have to be paid through other means. For UTA, that means taxes.

"How can we get more money?" is not a bad question. It is a critical question. Because money is the critical input for services. If you want to provide more services, you need to get more money.

Efficiency is a certainly a laudable goal. Asking "How can we provide the most service, the best service, for a given amount of money?" is important for any organization. But it is not necessarily the primary question that a transportation agency should be asking. It is not the question UDOT asks. UDOT asks "What are our needs?" and then goes looking of ways to fund them. It is a growth mentality, a mentality responsive not only to current conditions, but to future conditions.

Saying 'Can't be done' implies that it can never be done. The long range plan is full of projects that are impossible, today. But they are projects that are possible, over time. That's why its a plan--a list of future actions to meet a future objective. Achieving things, over time, that cannot be achieved immediately.