I’m becoming exponentially
more skeptical of the value of connected/autonomous vehicles. I’ve known L5
automation is still a long way off, but some of the reports suggests many
companies are still working on L3 automation. And there is zero evidence that
the developers are working on anything system able to perceive pedestrians,
implying that the cars will never be able to operate in a pedestrian rich
center city environment.
Operating
in ideal conditions (peak hour traffic, well-striped lanes, controlled access,
no pedestrians/cyclists) could happen tomorrow. But that exposes CAV to their
own ‘last mile problem’, on both ends of an auto trip, where such conditions
are absent.
Starting
with limited access highways, with ‘connected’ pylons to serve as a High Accuracy
Repeater Network for GPS navigation for expressways and other divided highways
is easy, and probably useful, as they represent the majority of VMT. But they
are an extreme minority of lane miles, and extending the network beyond that
would be problematic: road quality falls off quickly—striping is
incomplete/damaged/incorrect, curb/gutter are sometimes absent, curb-cuts
proliferate, and pavement quality declines.
No comments:
Post a Comment
And your thoughts on the matter?