Ever want to share the maps you've made on Google Earth? It's now simply and easy. Check it out!
http://www.gmodules.com/ig/creator?synd=open&url=http://dl.google.com/developers/maps/embedkmlgadget.xml
Showing posts with label mobile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mobile. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
UTA 2 Go Trip Planner
The UTA trip planner remains as frustrating to use as ever. It's a great idea with (unremarkably) poor implementation. The UTA trip planner relies on recognizing addresses*. The software that runs the trip planner relies on matching the address you enter to an address in its database.
The geodatabases used for the software are typically derived from U.S. postal files--great for keeping track of where to send mail, less useful for finding a physical address. Further, differences in notation may confuse the software. "150 S State Street" may be parsed as:
But UTA is hardly alone--this is characteristic of most transit planning tools.
I recall Portland's as being remarkably different, with one reason: It did not rely on addresses, but on intersections. I recall it as being something like this:
START: "23rd @ Burnside"
END: " Burnside @ NE 6th AVE"
Needless to say, there are vastly fewer intersections than addresses, making it much easier to for the software to find a match, making finding a start and end location much faster.
*The trip planner also recognizes some landmarks. Finding out which ones are acceptable is a matter of trial and error. "U of U" is not, while "University of Utah Bookstore" is.
The geodatabases used for the software are typically derived from U.S. postal files--great for keeping track of where to send mail, less useful for finding a physical address. Further, differences in notation may confuse the software. "150 S State Street" may be parsed as:
- 15000 South, State Street
- 150 South, State Street
- 150 South State Street
But UTA is hardly alone--this is characteristic of most transit planning tools.
I recall Portland's as being remarkably different, with one reason: It did not rely on addresses, but on intersections. I recall it as being something like this:
START: "23rd @ Burnside"
END: " Burnside @ NE 6th AVE"
Needless to say, there are vastly fewer intersections than addresses, making it much easier to for the software to find a match, making finding a start and end location much faster.
*The trip planner also recognizes some landmarks. Finding out which ones are acceptable is a matter of trial and error. "U of U" is not, while "University of Utah Bookstore" is.
Labels:
geotagging,
mobile,
online,
transit,
trip planning,
UTA,
web
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)